| Seventh-day Adventist Statement of Consensus Concerning Female Genital Mutilation |
|
 |
 |
Introduction
As part of their mission to the
entire world, Seventh-day Adventists have a firm commitment to provide health
care that preserves and restores human wholeness. By wholeness we mean the
harmonious development of the physical, intellectual, social, and spiritual
dimensions of a person's life, unified through a loving relationship with
God and expressed in generous service to others. Because Adventists believe
that each human being is created in God's image as a unified person, rather
than as a duality of body and soul, we believe in a ministry of grace that
affects all aspects of human life, including physical and emotional well-being.
Ministry to the entire person leads
Seventh-day Adventists to be concerned about the widespread practice of
female genital mutilation.[1] Often referred to as "female circumcision" or, more
recently, "female genital cutting," such practices currently affect scores
of millions of living women and girls, with additional millions of girls
disfigured annually. These estimates do not account for the young girls
who die as a result of the more radical forms of genital mutilation. These
practices range from excision of the clitoral prepuce to complete removal
of the vulva with closure of the vaginal opening. Our central concern, expressed
in this statement of principles, is for all forms of female genital injury
that lead to physical dysfunction or emotional trauma. Moreover, such procedures
are often done with unclean instruments, without anesthesia, on forcibly
held young girls between the ages of four and twelve. Hemorrhage, shock,
infection, incontinence, damage to surrounding organs, and massive scarring
are frequent results. In addition to this physical devastation, genital
mutilation is also emotionally traumatic.
Women who have been subjected to
genital mutilation are also often afflicted with a variety of long-term gynecological
health problems, including fistulas, chronic infections, and problems with
menstruation. Upon entering marriage, intercourse is usually a painful,
traumatic event, often necessitating reopening of the scarified vaginal opening. Childbirth
may also be impeded due to rigid scarring of the tissues. At times, maternal
and fetal deaths also result.
In the cultures where female genital
mutilation is prevalent, the practice is considered justified for a variety
of reasons. It is believed, for example, that such mutilation will preserve
virginity in unmarried women, assist in controlling their sexual drive, strengthen
sexual faithfulness for married women, and increase sexual pleasure for their
husbands. It is also believed that removal of all or part of female genitalia
improves cleanliness, is cosmetically desirable, and makes childbirth safer
for the infant. Because of these beliefs, women who have not undergone such
procedures may be considered unsuited for marriage. Despite evidence against
such reasons, and despite the efforts of numerous human-rights organizations,
the practice of female genital mutilation continues in a variety of cultures,
with a prevalence exceeding 90 percent in some countries.
In some cultures, female genital
mutilation is defended as a form of religious practice. While Seventh-day
Adventists strongly advocate protection of religious liberty, Adventists
believe that the right to practice one's religion does not vindicate harming
another person. Thus, appeals to religious liberty do not justify female
genital mutilation.
Biblical principles
The Adventist Church's opposition
to female genital mutilation is based on the following biblical principles:
1. Preservation of life and health. The
Bible presents the goodness of God's creation, including the creation of
human beings (Gen 1:31; Ps 139:13, 14). God is the Source and Sustainer
of human life (Job 33:4; Ps 36:9; John 1:3, 4; Acts 17:25, 28). God calls
for the preservation of human life and holds humanity accountable for its
destruction (Gen 9:5, 6;
Ex 20:13; Deut 24:16; Jer 7:3-34). The
human body is "the temple of the Holy Spirit," and followers of God are urged
to care for and preserve their bodies, including the Creator's gift of sexuality,
as a spiritual responsibility (1 Cor 6:15-19). Because female genital mutilation
is harmful to health, threatening to life, and injurious to sexual function,
it is incompatible with the will of God.
2. Blessing of marital intimacy. Scripture
celebrates the divinely ordained gift of sexual intimacy within marriage
(Eccl 9:9; Prov 5:18, 19; Song of Sol 4:16-5:1; Heb 13:4). The practice
of female genital mutilation should be renounced because it threatens the
Creator's design for the experience of joyful sexuality by married couples.
3. Healthful procreation. For
married couples, the gift of sexual union may be further blessed by the birth
of children (Ps 113:9; 127:3-5; 128:3; Prov 31:28). The fact that successful
childbirth is threatened by female genital mutilation is additional grounds
for opposition to this practice.
4. Protection of vulnerable
persons. Scripture prescribes that special efforts be made to care
for those who are most vulnerable (Deut 10:17-19; Ps 82:3, 4; Ps 24:11,
12;
Isa 1:16, 17; Luke 1:52-54). Jesus
taught that children should be loved and protected
(Mark 10:13-16; Matt 18:4-6). The
genital mutilation of young girls violates the biblical mandate to safeguard
children and protect them from harm and abuse.
5. Compassionate care. Love
for the neighbor prompts Christians to provide compassionate care to those
who have been injured (Luke 10:25-37; Isa 61:1). Christians are called to
care with compassion for those who have experienced physical and emotional
trauma caused by female genital mutilation.
6. Sharing truth. Christians
are called to overcome error by expressing the truth in a loving manner (Ps
15:2, 3; Eph 4:25). The fundamental truth of the gospel is intended to liberate
people from all types of bondage to falsehood (John 8:31-36). Thus, Christians
should join in sharing accurate information about the harm of female genital
mutilation and the beliefs that underlie this practice.
7. Respect for cultures. Christians
should be sensitive to and respectful of cultural differences (1 Cor 9:19-23;
Rom 12:1, 2). At the same time, we believe that God's principles transcend
cultural traditions (Dan 1:8, 9; 3:17, 18; Matt 15:3; Acts 5:27-29). The
fundamental principles of Scripture provide a basis for the transformation
of cultural practices. While we acknowledge that female genital mutilation
is firmly entrenched in many cultures, we find this practice to be incompatible
with divinely revealed principles.
Conclusion
Because female genital mutilation
threatens physical, emotional, and relational health, Seventh-day Adventists
are opposed to this practice. The Church calls on its health care professionals,
educational and medical institutions, and all members along with people of
good will to cooperate in efforts to eliminate the practice of female genital
mutilation. Through education and loving presentation of the gospel, it
is our hope and our intention that those threatened by this practice will
find protection and wholeness and that those who have been subjected to
this practice will find solace and compassionate care.
__________
This document was adopted by
the General Conference Christian View of Human Life Committee in April,
2000, and was referred to those Church departments and institutions which
will find the material useful.
[1]"Currently,
the different types of female genital mutilation known to be practised
are classified as follows: Type I Excision of the prepuce,
with or without excision of part or all of the clitoris Type II Excision
of the clitoris with partial or total excision of the labia minora Type
III Excision of part or all of the external genitalia and stitching/narrowing
of vaginal opening (infibulation) Type IV Unclassified: includes
pricking, piercing or incising of the clitoris and/or labia; cauterization
by burning of the clitoris and surrounding tissue; scraping of tissues
surrounding the vaginal orifice [angurya cuts] or cutting of the vagina
[gishiri cuts]; introduction of corrosive substances or herbs into the
vaginato cause bleeding or for the purposes of tightening or narrowing
it; and any other procedure that falls under the definition of female genital
mutilation given above." This classification is taken from Female
Genital Mutilation: A Joint WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA Statement. Published
by World Health Organization, Geneva, 1997.
|